literature osmos is no better than the U.S. in the 20th century. which tries to master margarita which there Sholokhov what marques even ... only the French stand near - there is also placers, but with three novels Joyce Burgess and Flann O'Brien drunk. I reread the book in my life 3. third just now reread. me again and turns like a kitten in a washing machine. when the first part - still nothing, but when Quentin starts, it's just a brain stem, my friends. As if all the chimes of all time still vibrate in those long fading rays of light, which Christ and St Francis, who called her sister. After all, if just to hell, and it's over. End. Around just to end. And no one there except osmos her and me. If we could do something so horrible that all escaped osmos from hell and we were alone. I said, Father, I committed incest This is me I'm not Dalton Ames And when he put ... Dalton Ames. Dalton Ames. Dalton Ames. Put a gun in my hand, and I did not shoot. That's why he did not. and people spend time and vishnevskogo Gavalda. crime.
Well Dunno. I think your opinion is constantly changing with time. by the way, but as you Dostoevsky?
Well the same time. people change osmos over time, and so sovershentsvuetsya. As a person changes his changing tastes and affection ... and so on). for example, a small schoolboy I read Gerald Durrell, Robert osmos Sheckley and etc.., and thought nothing cooler can not be. Then I began to think differently. yes. Dostoevsky there then?
No, I do not compare with Faulkner Sheckley, you misunderstood. I mean, everything is relative and that everything has its time and place. Faulkner 20 years you may forget and be passionate about something else that is right for you in spirit. About the 20th century, sorry, did not think, thought about you all the literature, it is.
I love Brautigan. Brautigan loved Faulkner. I probably would, too, must love him, my favorite writer favorite writer, all the cases, but sound and fury but I categorically rejects, I think, can here it in "need to grow"? and spend time Gavalda, even regardless of any other literature is always a crime.
Brautigan is very light and quite magical, like a cloud in watermelon sugar, that's it, that Faulkner and yes, you should try somehow in a state of rest, but the book itself irritates me, it is very difficult osmos to perceive, and somehow I do not but it is not close I am hopeful that someday and somehow)) my dvizhuha if talking about America - beatniks. how you treat them, buy ze wei?
ahahahahaha)) sorry-moi, it's osmos just a joke (the joke was born in the course of the next crazy talk in ICQ), but forgot to change it back. run-run edit profile! and thank you, thank you for such wonderful words to me, I was very very nice! :) And I'm glad you also like beatniks. osmos people who do not like them, I was apprehensive. :)
"Literature is no better than the U.S. in the 20th century." Only here there is some Joyce, some Huxley, some Cortázar, Asturias, Carpenter osmos than Americana nice addition Faulkner? Copeland fuck? Salinger??? Kerouac? Well, yes, there is another Hemingway, Nabokov has. but it is ridiculous that any of the national literatures cross-cross-century - enough yet set apart enough distinguishable etc. in a cross-cross-stick century will not. another thing is that in America there is even such a complex - making your sobsvtennoy literature. Once all that was done in the United States - flowed into the European process, premised on it and they also ended. concrete Germans, Frenchmen often eerie, intelligent Englishmen, magic Latinos, a fucking fuck useless and that the Russians have literature states? they are simpler, smaller, more common. I love Faulkner and Hemingway, for example, but they are no bigger than Joyce, Proust, Sartre, Camus, osmos Golding, etc. and general level in liters U.S. cross-century osmos cross still below purely in terms of skills and intelligence.
pardonte osmos Fitz and the old man? And Vonnegut? And Eliot, at least nominally? Henry Miller? Harper Lee? Well beatniks do not count, okay. Saroyan? easier and more common - and why is it bad? I am deeply convinced that the evolution to the genius comes from the complex to the simple. Well, judge that the most important thing in life? Sex and food. Kindness and moderation. That's the way to sue for me - Saxons multiply very unhealthy literature. Shallow, meaningless but full of intertextuality, based only going wild narcissism osmos and (in some places) katektsiey the world - and their own - shit. (Sorry if offend your reverence for specific authors such generalization.) osmos And then that modern Russian authors are not in demand abroad - lie and a provocation, by golly. Not in mass culture, but in reading circles osmos is quite a known and appreciated.
Vonnegut? Miller? Lee? of them read only Miller, I love Lee, I do not like Vonnegut but if Dr. Golding
No comments:
Post a Comment